The Lost Vocation of Medicine: From Calling to Commodity

By Joseph Varon, MD, Brownstone Institute

When I was a young medical student, I believed with all my heart that medicine was the highest calling a human being could answer. We were not just training to earn a degree or secure a position. We were stepping into a lineage, inheriting a tradition that stretched back to Hippocrates, Galen, Vesalius, Osler, and countless others who saw the care of the sick as a sacred covenant. Every time I walked into a ward, I felt both nervous and exhilarated, as if I were entering a cathedral where the human body and spirit were laid bare.

A patient’s trust was not a transaction—it was a gift, a profound act of vulnerability. To be allowed into that sacred space was to be given a responsibility greater than anything I had known. We did not speak in the language of “compliance metrics” or “quality indicators.” We spoke of healing, of service, of devotion. Medicine was not a career. It was a vocation, a purpose, a life anchored in something deeper than self.

Over the years, however, something shifted. What was once a vocation has been stripped of its soul. It has been rebranded, reframed, and reduced until it barely resembles the profession I entered with such hope. Medicine today is a business enterprise. Patients are consumers, doctors are “providers,” and healing has been crowded out by billing codes, liability fears, and the suffocating weight of bureaucracy. The vocation has been replaced by a job, and a job can always be abandoned. That is what haunts me most.

The decline of vocation did not happen overnight. It was gradual, almost imperceptible at first, like a slow leak in the hull of a ship. Administrators multiplied until they outnumbered physicians. Insurance companies dictated what treatments were permissible, not based on medical judgment but on actuarial tables. Pharmaceutical firms turned research into marketing, blurring the line between scientific discovery and sales strategy. Hospitals transformed into corporations with CEOs, branding departments, and profit margins to defend. The physician’s desk became a computer terminal, and the patient was no longer a soul in need of healing but a data point to be coded and billed. Even the language betrayed the transformation: patients became “units of care,” outcomes became “deliverables,” and clinical judgment was rebranded as “adherence to protocol.”

This hollowing out of medicine’s soul reached its most devastating climax during Covid. It was a moment that should have summoned the deepest instincts of our profession. Uncertainty, fear, and suffering filled our hospitals. That is precisely when vocation matters most. The physician is supposed to walk into the fire when others flee. Yet what did we see? Doors closed, clinics shuttered, doctors retreating to their homes, waiting for bureaucrats and government agencies to tell them what to do. Protocols were enforced even when they harmed. Independent thought was punished. Dissent was silenced. And while patients gasped for air and families begged for help, too many physicians were nowhere to be found.

I remember vividly those early days of the pandemic. There was terror in patients’ eyes, but also profound gratitude when they saw a physician willing to step into the room, to touch them, to treat them as human beings rather than contagions. The vocation of medicine means that when everyone else runs out, the doctor runs in. Yet in those months, only a few did. The rest followed orders from afar, citing fear or policy as justification for absence. Covid revealed what I had long suspected: when medicine is reduced to a job, it can be deserted. But when it is a vocation, it cannot.

This crisis was not an accident. Its roots stretch back decades. The Flexner Report of 1910 reshaped American medicine for better and worse. On one hand, it elevated scientific standards and eliminated substandard schools. On the other hand, it centralized control, tethering medicine more tightly to institutional and governmental power. The apprenticeship model of mentorship—where students absorbed not just skills but ethos—gave way to industrialized training. Instead of being formed as healers, students were molded as technicians. They memorized protocols, but they did not absorb the sacred trust that comes with vocation.

As the years passed, the culture of medical education further eroded vocation. Students entered with idealism but were quickly buried under debt, exhaustion, and cynicism. The long hours and relentless pressure might have been tolerable if accompanied by true mentorship, but too often residents were taught that obedience mattered more than judgment, compliance more than conscience. Independent thought was punished; curiosity was suffocated. By the time many young doctors finished training, the fire that brought them to medicine had been extinguished. They learned to survive, not to serve. They asked, “How do I get through my shift?” not, “How do I heal this patient?” And so vocation faded into memory.

The corporatization of healthcare sealed the transformation. Most physicians today are not independent practitioners but employees of sprawling hospital systems. Their loyalty is no longer to the patient in the bed but to the employer who pays their salary. When conflicts arise—and they do—doctors are pressured to serve the system, not the individual. Metrics dominate their day. Doctors spend more time entering notes into electronic medical records than speaking to their patients. They practice defensive medicine, not inspired medicine.

In this new order, the sacred trust between doctor and patient is fractured, and patients feel it. They sense the hesitation, the divided loyalty, the invisible administrator lurking in the background of every decision.

During the Covid-19 pandemic, that fracture widened into a chasm. Patients watched doctors recite government talking points rather than speak with their own voices. They saw courageous physicians punished for questioning harmful policies. They saw lives lost because protocols were enforced with blind rigidity. In the process, trust in medicine collapsed. Patients did not abandon science—they abandoned a system that no longer felt human.

The cost of this loss is immense. It is measured not only in suffering patients but in the moral injury inflicted on physicians who still believe in vocation, for those of us who refused to abandon patients, who entered the Covid wards when others would not, the betrayal by our colleagues was harder to bear than the virus itself. We saw medicine reduced to bureaucracy; our profession degraded to a managerial class in white coats. We saw joy replaced by despair. The joy of medicine—the joy of touching a life, of helping someone breathe again—cannot survive long in a system where patients are processed like products.

Yet despite all this, I remain convinced that vocation can be reclaimed. I have seen sparks of it. I have worked alongside nurses whose compassion burned bright even when the system tried to smother it. I have mentored students who still dared to look at patients with wonder, who resisted the temptation to see them as checklists. These moments remind me that the vocation is not dead. It is dormant. And like all dormant things, it can awaken—but only if we fight for it.

Reclaiming medicine as a vocation will not be easy. It means refusing to accept the idea that profit should dictate care. It means confronting administrators when their directives betray patients. It means daring to trust your own judgment, even when the system demands obedience. It means remembering that healing is not found in guidelines alone but in listening, in touching, in caring. It means reviving the joy of medicine, which can never be measured in quarterly reports. Above all, it means refusing to forget why we entered this profession in the first place.

To practice medicine as a vocation in today’s world is costly. It may mean losing a job, losing status, even losing friends. But the cost of surrendering vocation is far greater. If we continue down this path of commodification, medicine will not survive as a profession worthy of trust. Patients will turn elsewhere, society will fracture further, and the sacred bond between physician and patient will be broken beyond repair.

The choice before us is stark. Medicine will either be a vocation or it will be nothing. We can remain cogs in a machine that processes patients like widgets and rewards obedience above conscience. Or we can reclaim our calling, rediscover the courage and compassion that defined medicine for centuries, and once again stand with our patients as healers rather than employees. That choice belongs not only to doctors but to patients, students, and society as a whole. Patients must demand more. Students must resist the system’s suffocation. Doctors must rediscover the flame that first lit their path.

If we succeed, perhaps one day a new generation will walk into a hospital with the same awe I once felt, aware that they are part of something sacred, aware that medicine is not a commodity but a covenant. That is the vocation of medicine. It is the beating heart of our profession. And it is worth fighting for with everything we have left.

Joseph Varon

Joseph Varon, MD, is a critical care physician, professor, and President of the Independent Medical Alliance. He has authored over 980 peer-reviewed publications and serves as Editor-in-Chief of the Journal of Independent Medicine.

Published under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. For reprints, please set the canonical link back to the original Brownstone Institute Article and Author.