The UN frets about depopulation after decades of sabotaging fertility rates
The United Nations is warning about low fertility rates worldwide after spending decades trying to achieve just that.
A recent survey from the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) polled 14,000 people across 14 countries about their fertility rates: South Korea, Thailand, Italy, Hungary, Germany, Sweden, Brazil, Mexico, US, India, Indonesia, Morocco, South Africa, and Nigeria. Twenty percent of respondents said they don’t yet have or don’t expect to have their desired number of children.
"The world has begun an unprecedented decline in fertility rates," says UNFPA chief Dr. Natalia Kanem. "Most people surveyed want two or more children. Fertility rates are falling in large part because many feel unable to create the families they want. And that is the real crisis.”
Most countries today have less than 2.1 children per woman, which is the rate a population needs to replace itself. Researchers warn that by 2050, two-thirds of countries will lack the fertility rates to sustain their populations. That number will increase to 97% by 2100, which is when sub-Saharan Africa is expected to account for 50% of global births. Currently, fertility rates are highest in Africa, where Chad boasts the highest in the world.
The UN’s alarm over low fertility rates comes despite the organization’s desperate efforts to curb fertility rates through initiatives like feminism, promoting homosexuality, and aggressive “reproductive rights” campaigns pushing abortion and contraceptives. The UNFPA boasts that, in 2022 alone, it provided 59 million couple-years of protection—meaning it distributed enough contraceptives to prevent 59 million couples from becoming pregnant for one year.
FP2030: A mass depopulation program
In July 2012, UNFPA staff held a meeting with the US Agency for International Development (USAID), the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, and the UK Department for International Development (DFID). The goal of the meeting was “to empower the voluntary use of modern contraception by 120 million additional women and girls in the world’s lowest-income countries by 2020.” Family Planning 2020 (FP2020) was formed.
FP2020 soon recruited over 130 governments, organizations and corporations to join the cause. Drug companies like Pfizer and Bayer pledged to provide birth preventive products all around the world.
As 2020 approached, FP2020’s founders evidently deemed it so successful that they renewed it for another decade and renamed the organization FP2030. Its globalist managers include North America and Europe Managing Director Monica Kerrigan, MPH, who previously worked for Planned Parenthood, the Gates Foundation, and USAID.
In 2021, FP2030 received $1.4 billion from government funding alone, including an annual contribution of over $500 million from USAID.
When starting a birth prevention campaign in a target country, FP2030’s founding organizations first contact an official in that country’s Health Ministry. They present the official with a strategy containing high-impact practices (HIPs) for preventing births on a mass scale and provide them with the funds to execute it.
However, FP2030’s goal is not simply to make birth prevention devices available, but to convince women to take them. Therefore, any mass birth prevention strategy must “improve attitudes.”
One of the main vehicles used for changing minds and attitudes towards birth prevention is mass media. In a 2016 High Impact Practices Partners’ meeting attended by FP2030 operatives, organizations were encouraged to “[u]se one or more mass media channels (radio, TV, print) to increase knowledge, improve attitudes and self-efficacy, and encourage social change to effect family planning.”
Another part of the strategy is using gender confusion ideology to prevent mass births. Whereas men and women naturally desire to have children, masculinizing women and effeminizing men — contravening “gender norms” — is an effective way to stagnate population growth.
“For FP2030, an intentional approach to gender equality makes our work more effective in advancing both family planning and gender equality,” says an FP2030 presentation titled “FP2030 Gender Strategy.”
The organization plainly states that “[g]ender norms . . . create barriers to FP access” and “[w]ith greater funding and scale, gender-transformative approaches will advance gender equality and accelerate progress on contraceptive access and use.”
In countries where birth prevention rates are stagnant, FP2030 says gender ideology, or “positive gender norms,” can be “more effective”: “In countries where contraceptive prevalence has plateaued, demand-side interventions promoting positive gender norms can be more effective than supply‑side approaches.”
Gender Strategy notes that feminist operatives are also very helpful in driving birth prevention.
Such gender confusion — where women are masculinized and men are effeminized — is also achieved by birth prevention drugs themselves. According to scientific evidence, women who take birth prevention pills are likely to find more effeminate men attractive and cause themselves to be less attractive to men. They are also more likely to be sexually dissatisfied and cheat on their partners.
The desire among globalists to prevent births is aggressive. Even though certain birth preventive injections can increase the risk of HIV, for example, the World Health Organization (WHO) still recommends they be provided to women.
“WHO advises that women should not be denied the use of progestogen-only injectables because of concerns about the possible increased [HIV] risk,” reads an FP2020 report. Women should be made aware of the increased risk of HIV, it continues, but they should also be told there is “uncertainty over a causal relationship.”
Vaccination is also included in FP2030's mass birth prevention strategy.
Nepal’s government, for instance, “is developing an integrated care strategy that includes family planning and immunization integration. Progress is being made on ensuring that post-abortion family planning is regularly offered.” FP2030 funds to Nepal also go towards “employing mass media to reach youth, ethnic minorities, and marginalized and disadvantaged groups with family planning information.”
Feminism
But “reproductive rights” like abortion and contraceptives are only one way the UN has achieved lower birth rates. Feminist objectives like increasing the number of women in higher education and the workforce are also associated with lower fertility rates. The UN is known to encourage women’s participation in the labor force at nearly every opportunity, even turning it into a public health issue.
This has become an unmistakable success. According to data from Pew Research, millennial women are four times more likely than those in the Silent Generation to have a bachelor’s degree — and the more educated a woman becomes, the more likely she is to postpone having children or not have them at all.
In the 1960s only about 40% of women were employed. Today, that number is 72% among Millennial women.
Business Insider says declining birth and marriage rates are being driven by women who are choosing careers over children, which it claims is “a sign of economic progress, signaling a rise in individualism and women's autonomy.”
"I couldn't imagine juggling work and children. I wouldn't be able to care for my two dogs without my husband,” 40-year-old career woman Jennifer Mathieu told the publication, adding: "I have zero regrets, love my life, and think at least three to four times a week about how thankful I am that I do not have children."
"We both work hard at our careers and honestly didn't feel like children fit into the life and goals we wanted," said Heather Watson, another female professional. "It always felt like it would be unfair to kids to try to fit them into our lives."
“Kids are expensive and sticky,” said another.
